Dr Tomasz Majchrowski

Advisor – Energy Transition & Regulated Systems

Strategy · Governance · Solution-Engineering

About me

Who I am

I’m Tomasz — a strategist, a system-thinker, and a solution-engineer working in complex technical and environmental systems.

I bring over a decade of experience in nuclear decommissioning and radioactive waste management across the United Kingdom and European Union — an environment where the regulation, the stakes, and the time horizons are about as demanding as they get.

That work has already crossed boundaries and integrated disciplines — building assurance cases that convince regulators and the public that a decision will hold up decades later, governing programmes where trust is the real currency — is exactly what energy transition needs now, as investment accelerates faster than governance can keep up.

Extending deliberately into energy transition is the direction I’m building toward.  My focus is on the intersection of technical systems, governance, and responsible strategy — supporting organisations that need depth, coherence, and a systemic view of change.


My background


How I show up

Calm, rational, and direct. I don’t sell hype or jargon. My approach is Socratic more often than directive — I’d rather help you see your own situation clearly than hand you a prescription you haven’t tested against your own judgement. This draws on years spent mentoring technical teams and continues today through mentoring students. Clients who work well with me are the ones who want a thinking partner, not just an answer.


Why work with me

A rare combination, not a broader claim. Most energy transition advisors have never worked inside nuclear-grade governance; most nuclear specialists have never engaged with grid or transition frameworks. That combination is what’s different here — not superior expertise in either domain alone.

An advisor, not a delivery resource. My role is to help you see the real problem, map the options, and build a plan your team can act on — then step back. No scope creep, no created dependency, no reason to stay involved longer than the decision itself needs.